The whole "Move out of embassies" order due to terrorists was just created as an excuse for America’s prism surveillance, this whole thing was made up to justify the US monitoring our phone calls and emails.
I do not like this at all, however most people know threats to USA may provoke a response. So one can not place the blame entirely on the USA. The acts of both are very bad!
they never mention whether the Yemenis government wanted us there. drones are terrible addition to war. if you don’t have the guts to fight your enemy face to face stay out of War. those of us who fight with owner don’t want you here. 03 for life semper fi.
This comment outlines expert, scholarly publications in the literature and official policy/legal/doctrine documents;
To learn the domestic/international law/policy regarding drone strikes, see the following documents:
1) DOJ’s May 25, 2011, White Paper on Legality of a Lethal Operations by the CIA against a US Citizen
2) 2014 DoD Report to Congress on Process for Determining Targets of Lethal or Capture Operations
3) DOJ July 16, 2010, memorandum, Re: Applicability of Federal Criminal Laws and the Constitution to
Contemplated Lethal Operations Against Shaykh Anwar alAulaqi
4) DOJ White Paper, Lawfulness of a Lethal Operation Directed Against a U.S. Citizen Who
Is a Senior Operational Leader of Al-Qa’ida or An Associated Force
Now, are they effective? Answer: A clear yes! See,
1) Patrick B. Johnston, Anoop K. Sarbahi; The Impact of US Drone Strikes on Terrorism in Pakistan, International Studies Quarterly,
Volume 60, Issue 2, 1 June 2016, Pages 203–219
2) Aqil Shah, Do U.S. Drone Strikes Cause Blowback? Evidence from Pakistan and Beyond, International Security
Volume 42 | Issue 04 | Spring 2018 p.47-84
3) Bryan C. Price. “Targeting Top Terrorists: How Leadership Decapitation Contributes to Counterterrorism.”
Quarterly Journal: International Security, vol. 4. no. 36. (Spring 2012): 9-46
4) Report: ISR Support to Small Footprint CT Operations – Somalia/Yemen, ISR Task Force Reg and Analysis Division Feb 2013
For an understanding of LOAC, ROEs, SPINS, STARS, CDE, PID, etc:
1) Targeting, Air Force doctrine document 2-1.9 8 June 2006
2) McNeal, Gregory S., Targeted Killing and Accountability (March 5, 2014). 102 Georgetown Law Journal 681-794 (2014)
3) Joint Fire Support, Joint Publication 3-09
4) Commander’s Handbook for Joint Battle Damage Assessment, 1 June 2004
5) Major James A. Burkart (JAG), Deadly Advice: Judge Advocates and Joint Targeting, The Army Lawyer, June 2016
6) Merriam, John, Affirmative Target Identification: Operationalizing the Principle of Distinction for U.S. Warfighters (April 15, 2015).
56:1 Virginia Journal of International Law 83 (2016).
7) Corn, Geoffrey S. and Corn, Gary P., The Law of Operational Targeting: Viewing the LOAC Through an Operational Lens (August 21, 2011).
Texas International Law Journal, 2012
8) Schmitt, Michael N. and Biller, Jeffrey et al; Joint and Combined Targeting: System and Process (August 25, 2016). Weighing Lives in War (Jens Ohlin, Larry May & Claire Finkelstein eds. Oxford University Press 2017)
9) CJCS Instruction: No-Strike and the Collateral Damage Estimation Methodology, 2012
10) Targeting and the Law of War Administrative Investigations & Criminal Law Supplement
To really drive this home, I recommend the following legal textbooks and treatises on the subject:
1) Geoffrey S. Corn, Rachel E. VanLandingham et al; U.S. Military Operations
Law, Policy, and Practice, 2015
2) William H. Boothby and Michael N. Schmitt; The Law of Targeting, 2012
3) Terry D. Gill and Dieter Fleck; The Handbook of the International Law of Military Operations 2nd edition, 2016
4) William Boothby, Weapons and the Law of Armed Conflict 2nd Edition, 2016
Australia, UK, and others have almost identical approaches.
Now, are these followed? Yes!
Look at any AR 15-6 investigation into CIVCAS by the US.
Several militants killed in recent wave of U.S. drone strikes.
The whole "Move out of embassies" order due to terrorists was just created as an excuse for America’s prism surveillance, this whole thing was made up to justify the US monitoring our phone calls and emails.
well so they found a more efficient way to pass a bomb through our screening machines….shit
More lies and people believe it
These guys go around blowing othets and themselves up, the lowest of life form
Hahahahahahhahahahahaha
ABC and America gov your both full of shit lmao
Tragic any time there is col
Hahaha
There is no clear evidence of that except to crazy conspiracy lunies
of course they wont say about innocent civilians being killed they dont wanna make america look bad.
Sacrifices have to be made.
Something bad is about happen.
Shill
I do not like this at all, however most people know threats to USA may provoke a response. So one can not place the blame entirely on the USA. The acts of both are very bad!
USA terrorist attacks. More bombs from thr criminals in DC.
I was hoping to see the drones in action.
collateral casualties but the 3000 dead on 9/11 weren’t collateral, they were targets. War sucks!
Death to america
its already happening
I LOVE Drones, US-casualties-0
America takes it upon itself to provide to police the world from jihadist and communist.
You of all people should like America the most mr "peacemaker" we keep the peace.
The bullshit that U.S News feeds its population is nearly as hilarious as the fact that they believe it.
i dont understand how they can not detect a underwear bomb as much time and money they put in to all these detectors ..
September 11discovery bitch go and fuck ur self ur stupid fuck !
Video Games
they never mention whether the Yemenis government wanted us there. drones are terrible addition to war. if you don’t have the guts to fight your enemy face to face stay out of War. those of us who fight with owner don’t want you here. 03 for life semper fi.
Need a war to produce a reason to make money.
I don’t see you over there helping them. Internet thug.
Just looked like some shitty underwear to me.
This comment outlines expert, scholarly publications in the literature and official policy/legal/doctrine documents;
To learn the domestic/international law/policy regarding drone strikes, see the following documents:
1) DOJ’s May 25, 2011, White Paper on Legality of a Lethal Operations by the CIA against a US Citizen
2) 2014 DoD Report to Congress on Process for Determining Targets of Lethal or Capture Operations
3) DOJ July 16, 2010, memorandum, Re: Applicability of Federal Criminal Laws and the Constitution to
Contemplated Lethal Operations Against Shaykh Anwar alAulaqi
4) DOJ White Paper, Lawfulness of a Lethal Operation Directed Against a U.S. Citizen Who
Is a Senior Operational Leader of Al-Qa’ida or An Associated Force
Now, are they effective? Answer: A clear yes! See,
1) Patrick B. Johnston, Anoop K. Sarbahi; The Impact of US Drone Strikes on Terrorism in Pakistan, International Studies Quarterly,
Volume 60, Issue 2, 1 June 2016, Pages 203–219
2) Aqil Shah, Do U.S. Drone Strikes Cause Blowback? Evidence from Pakistan and Beyond, International Security
Volume 42 | Issue 04 | Spring 2018 p.47-84
3) Bryan C. Price. “Targeting Top Terrorists: How Leadership Decapitation Contributes to Counterterrorism.”
Quarterly Journal: International Security, vol. 4. no. 36. (Spring 2012): 9-46
4) Report: ISR Support to Small Footprint CT Operations – Somalia/Yemen, ISR Task Force Reg and Analysis Division Feb 2013
For an understanding of LOAC, ROEs, SPINS, STARS, CDE, PID, etc:
1) Targeting, Air Force doctrine document 2-1.9 8 June 2006
2) McNeal, Gregory S., Targeted Killing and Accountability (March 5, 2014). 102 Georgetown Law Journal 681-794 (2014)
3) Joint Fire Support, Joint Publication 3-09
4) Commander’s Handbook for Joint Battle Damage Assessment, 1 June 2004
5) Major James A. Burkart (JAG), Deadly Advice: Judge Advocates and Joint Targeting, The Army Lawyer, June 2016
6) Merriam, John, Affirmative Target Identification: Operationalizing the Principle of Distinction for U.S. Warfighters (April 15, 2015).
56:1 Virginia Journal of International Law 83 (2016).
7) Corn, Geoffrey S. and Corn, Gary P., The Law of Operational Targeting: Viewing the LOAC Through an Operational Lens (August 21, 2011).
Texas International Law Journal, 2012
8) Schmitt, Michael N. and Biller, Jeffrey et al; Joint and Combined Targeting: System and Process (August 25, 2016). Weighing Lives in War (Jens Ohlin, Larry May & Claire Finkelstein eds. Oxford University Press 2017)
9) CJCS Instruction: No-Strike and the Collateral Damage Estimation Methodology, 2012
10) Targeting and the Law of War Administrative Investigations & Criminal Law Supplement
To really drive this home, I recommend the following legal textbooks and treatises on the subject:
1) Geoffrey S. Corn, Rachel E. VanLandingham et al; U.S. Military Operations
Law, Policy, and Practice, 2015
2) William H. Boothby and Michael N. Schmitt; The Law of Targeting, 2012
3) Terry D. Gill and Dieter Fleck; The Handbook of the International Law of Military Operations 2nd edition, 2016
4) William Boothby, Weapons and the Law of Armed Conflict 2nd Edition, 2016
Australia, UK, and others have almost identical approaches.
Now, are these followed? Yes!
Look at any AR 15-6 investigation into CIVCAS by the US.
Ok who got the predator missile on bo2
Underware bomb😂🤣
God send it!
US supports human rights violators fake democracies